Skip to content
PahrumpWellService

Order 1293 & well deepening in Pahrump, plainly explained

The single most misunderstood rule affecting Pahrump homeowners with wells — what it actually restricts, what it doesn’t touch at all, and the court fight that decided whether it would survive.

Quick answer

Order 1293 only restricts new domestic well permits in the Pahrump basin (2.0 acre-feet of water rights must be relinquished). It does not restrict repairing, replacing, or rehabilitating a well you already have.

Technician fitting well system piping — illustrative stock photo of well service work, not an actual Pahrump job site

What Order 1293 actually says

On December 19, 2017, the Nevada State Engineer issued Order 1293, addressing new domestic wells in the Pahrump Artesian Basin (Basin 162). The core requirement: an application for a new domestic well permit must relinquish 2.0 acre-feet of water rights in good standing before the well can be permitted.

That relinquishment requirement is separate from — and in addition to — the existing annual usage cap that already applies to every domestic well in Nevada: 2 acre-feet per year, roughly 1,800 gallons per day, under NRS 534.180. Order 1293 didn’t change how much water an existing well can pump. It changed what it takes to get a permit for a brand-new one.

Order 1293A: the narrow amendment

On July 12, 2018, the State Engineer issued Order 1293A, adding two narrow exceptions after landowners who were already mid-process pushed back:

These exceptions were narrow and time-boxed to late 2017 — they are not relevant to a parcel bought or developed today. For essentially every current Pahrump homeowner, the operative rule is the plain one above: new domestic well = 2 AF relinquishment, unless the parcel’s water rights were already dedicated when the parcel was created.

What is NOT restricted — the part everyone misses

The distinction that matters

Under NAC 534.188 and 534.189, replacement of an existing domestic well and reconditioning or rehabilitation of an existing domestic well are explicitly excepted from Order 1293’s relinquishment requirement. If you already have a well and it needs a new pump, a deeper setting, a cleaned-out screen, or a full rehab, Order 1293 has essentially nothing to do with your project.

This is the distinction that trips up the most homeowners — and, we’ve seen, the occasional contractor who should know better. “Deepening” or “rehabilitating” a well you already own is treated as maintenance on an existing water right, not a request for a new one. The practical effect: nearly all of the well work that actually happens in Pahrump — covered in our pump repair & service guide and replacement cost guide — proceeds completely outside Order 1293’s reach. Be wary of anyone who cites Order 1293 as a reason your existing well project needs extra permitting or water-rights costs it doesn’t actually require — see the red flag list in our no-water triage guide.

The legal fight, briefly

Order 1293 wasn’t uncontested. A group of landowners, organized as Pahrump Fair Water LLC, sued, arguing the State Engineer lacked authority to restrict domestic wells this way and that the order violated due process by issuing without adequate notice. In late 2018, a Nye County district court agreed and ordered the State Engineer to reverse the order — which the State Engineer did on December 13, 2018, while noting the reversal was subject to the pending appeal, and obtained a stay.

The case reached the Nevada Supreme Court as Wilson v. Pahrump Fair Water, LLC, 481 P.3d 853 (Nev. 2021). On February 25, 2021, the court reversed the district court and reinstated Order 1293A, holding that NRS 534.110(8) — which lets the State Engineer “restrict the drilling of wells” where additional wells would cause undue interference with existing ones — plainly authorized the restriction. The court also rejected the argument that domestic wells were exempt from this authority, noting the legislature had progressively brought domestic wells into Nevada’s water-rights system over time. The court remanded one narrower issue — whether the order amounts to an unconstitutional taking — back to the district court; we found no public record that this separate claim has since been resolved.

Bottom line for a homeowner today: Order 1293A has been in continuous force since February 2021, and there is no live legal challenge we could find that puts its core requirement — 2 AF relinquishment for new domestic wells — in doubt.

Why this exists at all

The Pahrump Artesian Basin is over-appropriated: roughly 11,000 domestic wells draw on a basin where water levels have been declining since the 1950s. The Nye County Water District’s own Estimated Effects of Water Level Declines analysis projects 400+ domestic well failures by 2035 and 3,000+ by 2065 if the trend continues. NCWD also runs an ongoing Water Level Measurement Program tracking conditions across the valley. Against that backdrop, the State Engineer’s stated rationale — and the one the Nevada Supreme Court upheld — is straightforward: every new well added to an already over-drawn basin makes the interference problem for existing wells worse.

Your decision path: rehab, deepen, replace, or new well

Situation Order 1293 applies? Typical cost
Pump repair or replacement, same well No — routine service $300–$600 repair; $2,000–$5,000+ replacement
Pump lowering (deeper setting, same well) No — reconditioning/rehab exception Varies with depth; roughly $500–$1,000 per added 100 ft
Well rehabilitation (screen cleaning, casing work, deepening the existing bore) No — reconditioning/rehab exception Job-specific; get a written scope
Replacing a failed well entirely, same parcel No — replacement exception Job-specific; comparable to a new well in drilling cost
Brand-new well, undeveloped parcel with no prior water rights Yes — 2.0 AF relinquishment required $13,000–$30,000+ drilling, plus cost of acquiring 2 AF of water rights

In practice, most homeowners calling about a well problem fall into one of the first four rows — meaning Order 1293 simply isn’t part of their project. It only becomes relevant for genuinely new construction on land that never had a well.

Checking your parcel’s water rights

If you’re evaluating raw land or unsure what your parcel already has, start with your APN (Assessor’s Parcel Number, on your Nye County property tax bill or the county assessor’s site). From there:

Sources & further reading

Related guides

Our methodology

This page is educational information, not legal advice, and reflects our research as of 2026-07-20. Regulatory claims are cited directly to Nevada State Engineer Order 1293 and 1293A, Nye County Water District, and Wilson v. Pahrump Fair Water, LLC, 481 P.3d 853 (Nev. 2021) via Justia. Well-failure projections are cited to Nye County Water District’s Estimated Effects of Water Level Declines analysis. Legal claims are re-verified before every site update — laws and litigation status can change. If your situation is unusual or high-stakes, confirm current status directly with the Nevada Division of Water Resources or an attorney before acting.

Order 1293 questions

Does Order 1293 stop me from repairing or replacing my existing well pump?

No. Order 1293 restricts drilling new domestic wells in the Pahrump basin. Repairing, replacing, or reconditioning/rehabilitating an existing domestic well is explicitly excepted under NAC 534.188 and 534.189 — none of that requires relinquishing water rights. See our pump repair & service guide for how routine service actually works.

What does Order 1293 actually require?

A new domestic well permit application in the Pahrump Artesian Basin (Basin 162) must relinquish 2.0 acre-feet of water rights in good standing. That is separate from, and in addition to, the existing 2 acre-foot annual usage cap (about 1,800 gallons per day) that already applies to domestic wells under NRS 534.180. Order 1293 was issued December 19, 2017; a narrower amendment, Order 1293A, followed July 12, 2018.

Was Order 1293 ever overturned?

Briefly, yes — and then reinstated. A Nye County district court sided with a group of landowners (Pahrump Fair Water LLC) in late 2018 and the State Engineer reversed the order pending appeal. The Nevada Supreme Court then reversed that decision on February 25, 2021, in Wilson v. Pahrump Fair Water, LLC, holding that NRS 534.110(8) authorized the restriction and reinstating Order 1293A. It has remained in force since. A narrower takings claim was sent back to the district court on remand; we found no public record that it has since been separately resolved.

I want a new well on undeveloped land — what are my options?

You would need to acquire and relinquish 2.0 acre-feet of existing water rights in good standing, unless your parcel already had water rights dedicated when it was created, or you fall under one of Order 1293A’s narrow exceptions (an intent-to-drill filing between December 15–19, 2017, or a pre-December 19, 2017 permit application — very few properties qualify at this point). Acquiring water rights is a real cost on top of drilling; a complete new well in Pahrump otherwise runs roughly $13,000–$30,000+. Talk to a Nevada-licensed well driller and, for the water-rights side, the Nevada Division of Water Resources before committing to a parcel.

Why does Pahrump restrict new domestic wells at all?

The Pahrump Artesian Basin is over-appropriated — roughly 11,000 domestic wells already draw on a basin where water levels have declined since the 1950s. The Nye County Water District projects 400+ domestic well failures by 2035 and 3,000+ by 2065 if declines continue. The State Engineer’s stated rationale, upheld by the Nevada Supreme Court, is preventing additional wells from causing undue interference with existing ones.

Free · No obligation

Have a well project? Get matched with a local pro

Tell us what's going on with your well and a pre-screened independent local pro will call you back — usually the same day.

Prefer to talk? Call (775) 571-7931 — fastest for no-water emergencies.

Call (775) 571-7931 Free Quote